21‏/06‏/2019

العروسة باربي تغطي وجهها! Barbie covers up



Barbie covers up
العروسة باربي تغطي وجهها
أرشيفي ينعش ذاكرتي
Oslo, 4 July 2009
When men are oppressed by the government, they vent their frustration by oppressing women in turn.
Modern woman has, in theory, come far in her emancipation: women hold office in the ministries of the interior and defence, in intelligence, diplomacy, justice, and also among the staff of the International Court of Justice and the UN. And yet, in reality, our women are no different to a Barbie doll whose owners are still deciding what she should wear, how long or short her clothes should be, how tight or loose, what material and what colour. When we talk about women, the conversation makes half our brains stop working. But some women prefer to send their entire brain off on a full, all-inclusive holiday.
Religion can be a matter of awareness, questioning, reason, intelligence and knowledge. The nineteenth century women’s rights activist Qasim Amin defended the values of Islam in one of the best books he ever wrote, The Egyptians, and liberal religious scholar Imam Muhammad Abduh once issued a fatwa that married religion and intellect. If you read the books of Mahmud Shaltut, Malik Ben Nabi Mohammed Asad, Rojer Garaudy, Murad Hoffman, Vincent Monteil and Ahmed Subhi Mansour, you won’t have a single doubt that Islam is a message from God and that it is a logical message.
But religion can also be the opium of the masses: a hallucinatory, sacred drug which brings its users into a headlong clash with logic and reason in blind support of their tyrants. It can be a jailor to lock up freedoms and throw away the key. This is where those who emphasise chastity come in. They are the true enemies of free woman; they are the enemies of her very humanity. They prefer to bury women alive in as many different ways as they can think of. Making women cover their faces and hands in veils and gloves is the biggest attempt to con modern-day Eve out of her dignity and ridicule her humanity. It distorts the interpretation of the Quranic verse in a way that isn’t far off forgery: it’s a brazen conspiracy to put words in the proverbial mouth of God.
You can love God, worship Him and learn from his Holy Book values such as benevolence, tolerance, beauty, love, liberty, equality and justice. Or you can search for what you erroneously believe to be the word of God and you will find racism, fanaticism, killing, murder, injustice, sectarianism, hate and arrogance. You could try to bring yourself closer to God by blowing yourself up in a kindergarten.
You can read this article and feel that women must be honoured and dignified by allowing them to show their faces, or you can wave your clenched fist in the air to threaten and abuse the writer using words always used by the neo-fanatics who always irritate me with their poor command of the Arabic language.
You can breathe in the sweet smell of courage from religion. Or you can resort to cowardice, finding refuge in certain interpretations you have heard quoted by what seems to you a voice of reason, but may well be as illogical and unreasonable as it comes. We see countless guests appearing on TV rattling on like headless chickens, or as if in place of their heads there were fossilised rocks thousands of years old. Regardless of the utter rubbish they spout, their followers are multiplying like rabbits.
Forcing women to cover up is a barefaced conspiracy against Muslim women because it negates any form of emotional communication for the female, who is God’s creation just as man is. The face is home to all our expressions of feeling. This is where we express our love, hate, scorn, anger, pride, naivety, stupidity, resistance, faith, disbelief, denial, joy, happiness, sadness, wretchedness, satisfaction… and deprivation.
God created the face for it to be a mirror to what is going on inside us. It blushes when we feel shy, turns pale when we feel sick. Our faces are an indicator of our emotional health. So many things can be told from the face, including our ethnic background and community, and it’s the intrigue stemming from our idiosyncrasies that makes us want to get to know each other. It doesn’t make sense to have one half of society hidden from the other.
Nothing is easier to understand than a simple line or verse from Quran, too clear to need interpreting and reading between the lines. God didn’t say a Muslim woman should cover her entire face. He said, “Tell your wives, your daughters and the women among the faithful to make their outer garments hang low over them.” The order to do so came directly from God and is clear beyond any doubt from now till Judgement Day. It is clear in the same way that it is forbidden to drink wine, eat pork, give a false testimony or kill people unjustly.
In my generation, we would regularly see the faces of our relatives, neighbours, colleagues, TV presenters… everywhere we looked we saw women’s faces. This is what natural life is all about and it cannot be natural to live without that kind of communication, without forging relationships with female colleagues, relatives or family relations. Like all young men, we spent our tender teenage years coming to terms with our bodies and the feeling of arousal. We all experienced the tribulations of puberty, but we grew out of it. No normal adult ever experienced wild lust and constant arousal just because he was able to see a woman’s face day or night.
That was once. Then those maniac clerics arrived on the scene to preach about sexual piety and their confused, pornographic interpretations of religion. Since then, they have worn us down with their mania and misguidance. They have reduced the entire religion to a treatise about sexual attraction and a prudish warning about its dangers, to protect poor, vulnerable men from the other half of society – supposedly their partners in taking care of Earth. These delirious theologians have established an unbreakable link between her face and his loins.
I once heard about a female doctor who called a Sheikh to ask him whether God would be angry with her for making the opening of her niqab, her face covering, big enough for her to wear glasses, as she couldn’t see well when she was trying to help her patients. All her education, her intellect and her faith in God’s mercy amounted to nothing – it couldn’t help her use her own mind. She buried all that when she put on a mummy’s head in place of her own – the empty head of someone who died a thousand years ago.
This mummified shell of a woman is no different from any girl who chooses freely to respond to the new “guardians of virtue” who know very well that the purpose of their stupid campaign is to spread a new culture of burying women alive behind the veil, while allowing male vice free rein. It is a device intended for good and evil to mix freely, but not fairly, letting men cheat on their wives without anyone knowing the identity of the woman walking by his side. They, in return, turn a blind eye to the corruption in the country.
I know that a transparent and honest conversation about this subject makes the “neo-maniacs” furious. But, whether deliberately or coincidentally, they are helping to encourage behaviour like being unfaithful, corruption, terrorism and sexual harassment.
Islam does not favour secret marriages. Every person in the neighbourhood, village or surrounding area must be made aware that a couple have been married. Religion was supposed to make it impossible for people to try to promote corruption, and that should include their rabid desire to cover a woman’s face. Ministries of the interior are busy protecting people (or the men in charge) from danger, yet there is little they can do if they are blind to the two greatest miracles given to us by God: our fingers with their prints and our faces with their unique features.
There must be thousands of terrorists, criminals, sex offenders, fugitives and unfaithful people hiding behind face-covering veils. They make a mockery of our religion, our countries, our way of thinking, while we stand by like gawking idiots. We let our tyrannical leaders abuse us in any way they choose, yet there are more ways for us to be more abused by those sexually rabid men who want to bury women alive.
I will say it over and over that hiding a woman’s face behind a cover is abhorrent to God. Those who believe in God must stop to consider His great power when it comes to the universe, human intellect, thinking and reason. They must ask themselves how much they truly believe in God. They need to liberate themselves from the pollution of the mind that has spread over the past twenty years like a pest devouring green pastures and leaving nothing behind it, not even common sense.
Since the army of sexual fanatic sheikhs invaded our lands, we are being pushed further and further backwards towards the Middle Ages. Every year we regress another decade and every decade we regress an entire century. The values they promote are the same ones the Quran warn us against, highlighting deplorable pagan behaviour: “When one of them is given news of the birth of a baby girl, his face darkens and he is filled with gloom.”
Freedom, democracy, benevolence, activism, human rights, labour, discipline, sound management, honesty, culture, research, child protection, protecting intellectuals – all these noble values are given short shrift in their system.
I am calling all free, liberal and honest Arab intellectuals to ask themselves: isn’t it about time to take things into their own hands to expose these smutty thinkers? We need to put a stop to this in the same way that we need to stop the brutality of our tyrants and their “heirs” who think they own us.
Those who say that the face of a woman makes men lustful and that the body of a man gets aroused when he sees a woman’s face are sick and abnormal. We should fear for our children when they are around and for our women too, even if they are cloaked in seventy black tents!
Let’s also not forget that the first thing God will ask a woman about on Judgement Day is her mind and how she used it.
I don’t doubt that there is a place for modesty when it comes to women’s dress and appearance. The issue I am trying to raise is how to elevate faith and how religion is understood. We should think about God’s miracle when it comes to fingers and faces, identity and fingerprints. This is a matter of human identity and identity has a role to play in the security of society.
Is a woman who covers her face protecting a sick man from himself or protecting herself from his lewd imagination? I challenge all the sheikhs with their sadistic view of the world to issue a statement, whether independently or jointly, to condemn the dictatorship, the tyranny, the rigged elections and the corruption that is so deeply rooted in our regimes. I urge them to demand the release of detainees and prisoners of conscience, to condemn the assumption that the sons of presidents should be heirs to the thrones of their fathers. I want them to say that Islam is against the president extending his tenure for more than two terms.
Can they organise a campaign against drugs and fraud? Would they stand up against the police using thugs and dangerous former convicts to terrorise honest civilians and opponents of the regime? I don’t think they want to do that. Their battle is focused on sex and sex alone. Their minds can’t grasp anything beyond terrorising women and threatening them with the torments of hellfire if they don’t respond to their husbands at any time of day, whenever he wants a release. They’re too busy warning a female Muslim doctor that God Almighty will be smite her with His fury when Doomsday comes because she made the gaps for her eyes on her face cover wider to see her patients more clearly.
They speak about free choice. If the women of society choose to cover their faces, why aren’t they allowing those who don’t want to cover their faces to show theirs? This freedom is a means to an ugly end. It’s the freedom to create a psychotic society.
What about the freedom of a person to see the face of those whom he/she is talking to at work, in school, in a hospital, at a public institution, at demonstrations, in a factory and at the market? But it’s not about freedom: it’s about male preferences and fears.
I read an article once about sexual attraction that asked which was more alluring: fingers or toes? The author reached the conclusion that it’s the fingers of women that make men feel most aroused.
How low and hard we have fallen! How backward we have become! Now we think with our loins and surrender our souls to the tyrants ruling over us. We have allowed a bunch of mentally ill men to tell us what to do when it comes to religion, science, education, culture and media.
The first step towards good faith in God starts here. Our Barbie doll women are obediently covering their faces and their minds. But it cannot be long until the empire of the fanatical, sex-obsessed sheikhs will fall. Then all the other false idols of the palace of tyranny will fall, too. The words tyranny and reason can’t be put together in the same sentence. Despots and dignity don’t go together.
It starts here. With the acceptance and faith that God is great. God is not a spectator watching a football match, rooting for the Muslim team and helping the midfielders penetrate the field all the way up to the goal for the Muslim to score. Then the Muslim bows to God to thank Him for endowing him with such footballing prowess. No. God is bigger than that. God is also greater than needing women to wrap themselves up before they can come closer to him. He’s greater than all the other thousands of false allegations and claims that we think came directly from the creator of the universe. These are nothing more than the misguided directions of a corrupt government’s maniacal clerics.
It starts here. With renewing our faith in God in a way that makes us rediscover His greatness, His might, His forgiveness, His benevolence, His love, His mercy. Then and only then will we realise that we were worshipping the false idol of the neo-fanatics.
محمد عبد المجيد
طائر الشمال
عضو اتحاد الصحفيين النرويجيين
أوسلو النرويج
Journalist/ Mohammad Abdelmaguid
Taeralshmal
Oslo Norway
أرشيفي ينعش ذاكرتي

The Copts: their rights and our duties

The Copts: their rights and our duties
Oslo, 5 September 2004
أرشيفي ينعش ذاكرتي

The Coptic presence in the fabric of Egyptian society grows ever more precarious when the authorities undermine their position by exposing it to partisanship, forming a wedge between those who support their demands and those who oppose them.
I am writing on Coptic issues from an Islamic perspective, for Islam teaches us that the rights of Egypt’s Copts should be no different to those of Muslims. The Copts are not merely another sect, minority or ethnic group; they are Egyptians who have opened up their hearts to Muslims for more than a thousand years. They preferred to retain their own religion but have never delayed in coming to the nation’s defence, despite it being an Islamic stronghold. They are not simply ‘people of the book’ or ‘people of the dhimma’, and neither are they the subjects of a foreign nation; they are Egyptian nationals who have the same rights and duties as Muslims.
A nation’s sanctity, security and safety are preserved by virtue of tolerance. Unfortunately, tolerance has waned ever since the late President Anwar Sadat began fuelling religious extremism and sectarian strife. The Islamic groups have swept aside the nation’s values and principles and replaced them with howling sectarianism and racism. The snake-like forces of extremism, fanaticism and radicalism that Sadat kept close to his chest may have stung him first, before going on to tear the country apart by way of terrorism, murderous attacks on tourists and Copts, and the exile of intellectuals, academics and journalists.
The problem is that the state does not recognise the equity of the Copts’ needs. Rather, it considers the matter a security issue and refers it to the Ministry of the Interior. President Hosni Mubarak has reaffirmed on many occasions that there is no problem with the Copts in Egypt. But this statement is not unusual for the same President who does not perceive that there is illiteracy in Egypt or religious extremism propagated by the press; who refuses to see that two million or so of his citizens live in cemeteries with the dead or that the Egyptians are the cheapest citizens of the third world both at home and abroad; and who is entirely oblivious to the fact that, should an Egyptian have the bad luck to find himself in the hands of a police officer in the rural provinces or Upper Egypt, he is unlikely to emerge with his dignity intact.
The president does not recognise the Egyptian Copts’ problems or do anything to alleviate their pain; nor does he even stand firmly in support of them when they experience discrimination. This is because his sovereign vision lacks a human dimension, as might be expected from a man who seized power via an emergency law. The Copts are therefore no different from other Egyptians, Muslim or Christian, who have been subjected, like citizens of Iraq, Jordan and Libya, to injustice, tyranny, robbery and aggression. The president’s policy is based on the assumption that Egyptians lack dignity. There is therefore nothing in them that deserves to be fought for or requires the state to exhaust its resources over; there is no need to hold emergency meetings or to exhort officers to stop trampling on the citizens’ dignity, if they don’t have any in the first place.
Egyptian Copts abroad, whose numbers exceed a million and who have been naturalised in their new countries, are essential and effective examples for Muslims and Christians alike. Their demands are perfectly just and fair, and they work to raise the value of citizenship, fight religious extremism in the name of tolerance, and achieve an equitable distribution of labour in accordance with efficiency, honour and integrity.
Citizenship is not a grant or a gift from the governor to the governed. No official has the right to discriminate when hiring for the highest state positions or to employ a Copt in a position with no upward mobility. Also, in accordance with just practice, no official should curb the ambitions or dash the hopes and dreams of any Copt, but rather keep the doors open to him, even if he were to nominate himself for the presidency of an Islamic country, just like Idi Amin Dada, who was the Muslim president of the majority Christian Uganda.
Discrimination is ultimately a form of arrogance and leads to the complete intellectual and ideological rejection of the other, especially in terms of religion and faith. As a Muslim, I know my religion well. I cherish it and believe rationally, emotionally and with complete certainty in Islam. No force can transcend my relationship with God or detract from my understanding of Islam. I believe that my Coptic brother must enjoy the same religious and national rights as me without exception. This means allowing a strict Coptic citizen, should he wish, to join the faculty of theology to major in law, to wear a robe and turban, or to participate in various positions and functions of the state.
Egypt needs a revolution of love and tolerance to return it to its former lustrous glory, but this revolution will not be driven by degenerate and racist men who preach mania.
The Copts make very legitimate demands that it is well within their right to make, after having stood for hundreds of years side by side with Muslims in defence of Egypt. God does not discriminate between people and all of us must stand individually before Him on the Day of Judgement. The scales will be in favour of the tolerant.
The Islam I know is based on guidance, tolerance, equality between human beings and the preservation of human rights. Furthermore, freedom of religion is a Quranic principle that no Muslim should ignore, for it is clearly commanded of all Muslims: “let those who wish to believe in it do so, and let those who wish to reject it do so.”[ From the Quran, Surat al-Kahf, The Cave (18:29)
] This divine command was directed to the prophet Muhammad who “[is] not there to control them.”[ From the Quran, Surat al-Ghashiya, The Overwhelming Event (88:22) 
]

Thus freedom of religion is an established principle in Islam, and every Muslim must not only obey this fully but must also conclude from it that whoever lives among Muslims should enjoy their same rights and comply with the same non-religious duties that accompany those rights.
The history of the Coptic Church in Egypt is not the sole inheritance of the Copts but also that of every Muslim to take pride in. Every Muslim should teach his children about the Copts’ struggle against Roman apostasy and the Copts’ alliance over hundreds of years with the Muslims to fight colonialism in Egypt.
Full equality in the workforce and in education is the Copts’ most basic right. Any attempt to limit this to Muslims is no different than the racist apartheid that the whites practised against the indigenous population of South Africa.
The grievances of our Coptic brothers are many: religious intolerance in state institutions; a lack of representation on radio and television and in the national press; the state’s non-neutral position regarding dogma and its distortion of Coptic population numbers in the national census; the failure of security forces to protect Copts from extremist groups; inequality in leadership positions; the editing out of certain chapters of history; withholding endowments to the Copts that are their primary source of funding for places of worship; ill treatment by police officers (remember the el-Kosheh village[ 21 Coptic Christians were the victims of a massacre in el-Kosheh village in Upper Egypt in 2000.] and the Church of the Resurrection incidents?); a lack of religious freedom for those who convert from Islam to Christianity; the isolation and marginalisation because of doctrinal differences; the fanatics’ control over media and education; and the government’s utter failure to recognise that Egypt’s Copts have any problems, issues or concerns whatsoever.
When I read our Coptic brothers’ demands, I am extremely embarrassed. As Muslims, this should be our battle as well. The lack of a Coptic presence in the higher tiers of the Egyptian decision-making process is an offence to the Copts. It’s an unjust discrimination against our partners in our homeland. And it is an explicit call to the major powers in the international community to intervene on behalf of the Christian minorities and come to their defence, although of course the Copts are no less hostile to colonialism in all its forms than Muslims are. Is there not one enlightened soul among us who foresees the danger or are there locks upon our hearts?[ This alludes to a verse in the Quran (Surat Muhammad, 47:24), “Will they not contemplate the Quran? Do they have locks on their hearts?”
Mohammad Abdelmaguid
Taeralshmal
Oslo Norway
محمد عبد المجيد
طائر الشمال
عضو اتحاد الصحفيين النرويجيين
أوسلو النرويج

أرشيفي ينعش ذاكرتي

لهذا لم أعُدْ أحب حِجابَ المرأة!

  لهذا لم أعُدْ أحب حِجابَ المرأة! كنتُ فرحا به منذ نصف قرن؛ فقد كان جزءًا من الحرية الفردية للمرأة، فلا تغطي شعرَها إلا واحد بالمئة من نساء...